> As I think about it more, I'm starting to think that I was wrong in my >feeling that "quartertone" should be synonymous with an interval 50 cents. >That as opposed to a something that functions as a quartertone (e.g., the >whether it's exactly 50 cents or not.
That would make it easier to describe the size of the 11th harmonic in relation to a "Perfect Fourth" (which is only a couple cents shy of 50) to someone who had no idea at all.
Best wishes,
Denny Genovese Director
Southeast Just Intonation Center sejic@afn.org World Harmony Project Inc. PO Box 15464 http://www.afn.org/~sejic Gainesville, FL 32604 USA
>I plan to be doing a term project on a windows-based, super-user-friendly >ji midi sequencer program and have a question.
That's admirable. Good luck with it.
You might be well-served to see how your "product plans" compare with Marion McCoskey's "FasTrack" JI MIDI sequencer, or possibly even Justonic's "Pitch Palette" software. I personally don't know much about the features of either.
>Which is better: fine/course presets or pitchbends on tempered notes?
First, I presume that by "tempered notes", you actually mean adjusted notes. That is to say that you're starting with a 12-tone equal-tempered basis (in a sense inherent in MIDI) and making them UNtempered (JI). (I'm not trying to nitpick - I just want to make sure I know what you're asking.)
Assuming that that's what you're asking about, there has been a bit of discussion about how to use pitch bend for microtonality. The tricky part clearly is how to synchronize it with note-ons under very legato playing. Since the either the pitch-bend message must precede the note-on or the reverse, you're going to have a "blurp" in pitch either at the attack of the current note or at the release of the previous note.
That is true provided that you play those notes on the same channel of course. One solution that has been proposed is to use a channel for each of the nominal 12 notes per octave. That has limitations of course, the most obvious one being that if you want individual melody lines to be rendered in a uniform instrumental timbre, then clearly you'll eat up 12 of your available 16 for a single timbre. You also have to figure out what to do with the comparatively rare situation where you do a legato note-change between two different pitches of nominally the same note (since they'll land on the same channel).
It is also more or less limited to tunings based upon a 12-toned paradigm, but for many purposes, that's a very agreeable limitation.
But pitch bend has been used successfully, if I recall correctly, by John Starrett and Denny Genovese. So you could perhaps consult with them.
> You might be well-served to see how your "product plans" compare with > Marion McCoskey's "FasTrack" JI MIDI sequencer, or possibly even Justonic's > "Pitch Palette" software. I personally don't know much about the features > of either.
Can someone please give more information on these?
There have been some problems raised with pitch bend tuning:
> Assuming that that's what you're asking about, there has been a bit of > discussion about how to use pitch bend for microtonality. The tricky part > clearly is how to synchronize it with note-ons under very legato playing. > Since the either the pitch-bend message must precede the note-on or the > reverse, you're going to have a "blurp" in pitch either at the attack of > the current note or at the release of the previous note.
MIDI transmits 3125 instructions per second. A pitch bend is 3 instructions. To send 16 of these takes 3*16/3125*1000=15.36 ms, or twice as much if you include the note-ons as well. Is this really a problem?
> i don't like using pitch bend...the pitch bend affects all notes on that > channel, meaning that you can really only do monophonic stuff. yuck.
That depends on your software, of course. With GM, you're limited to 15 melodic notes per MIDI stream. It's quite possible to go beyond this, but I've never wanted to.
>> You might be well-served to see how your "product plans" compare with >> Marion McCoskey's "FasTrack" JI MIDI sequencer, or possibly even Justonic's >> "Pitch Palette" software. I personally don't know much about the features >> of either. >Can someone please give more information on these?
Marion is on the list. Marion?
Justonic Tuning's ph# is (604) 682-3456.
>MIDI transmits 3125 instructions per second. A pitch bend is 3 >instructions. To send 16 of these takes 3*16/3125*1000=15.36 ms, >or twice as much if you include the note-ons as well. Is this >really a problem?
Yep, 'fraid so. Try it.
SMTPOriginator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu From: daschour@teaser.fr Subject: Microtonal Concert in Paris PostedDate: 21-09-97 19:21:10 SendTo: CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH ReplyTo: tuning@eartha.mills.edu $UpdatedBy: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH,CN=Manuel op de Coul/OU=AT/O=EZH RouteServers: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=notesrv1/OU=Server/O=EZH RouteTimes: 21-09-97 19:20:56-21-09-97 19:20:57,21-09-97 19:20:05-21-09-97 19:20:06 DeliveredDate: 21-09-97 19:20:06 Categories: $Revisions:
Received: from ns.ezh.nl by notesrv2.ezh.nl (Lotus SMTP MTA v1.1 (385.6 5-6-1997)) with SMTP id C1256519.005F4AB3; Sun, 21 Sep 1997 19:20:50 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA03134; Sun, 21 Sep 1997 19:21:10 +0200 Date: Sun, 21 Sep 1997 19:21:10 +0200 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA03132 Received: (qmail 9558 invoked from network); 21 Sep 1997 17:21:07 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Sep 1997 17:21:07 -0000 Message-Id: <199709211715.TAA12834@reliam.teaser.fr> Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu