back to list

S. Commas and Quartertones

🔗mr88cet@texas.net (Gary Morrison)

8/15/1997 6:58:32 AM
>I knew someone would pounce on my objection to general use of quartertone
>and say that syntonic comma should be restricted to 81:80.

Then again, I agree with you that "quartertone" should be limited to
specific pitch distance of 50 cents. But, as we've discussed before, I
believe that the term "syntonic comma" should be reserved for a specific
experimental result. Its use as a unit of measurement of temperament
(e.g., quarter-comma meantone) are too deeply engrained in musical history
to allow the term to be generalized into a generic tuning-error mechanism
that can have different results in different tuning systems.

Ivor Darreg and I also believe(d) that the fact that 81:80 provides such
an audibly-intuitive and historically-significant means of making an open
tuning system is an extremely important characteristic of that interval.
(By "open" tuning system I mean one that has an indefinite number of steps
per octave.) We believe to be so important a characteristic of the
syntonic comma that it doesn't make sense to generalize 81:80 in with a
general classification of intervals that don't also have that
characteristic.

That's kind of like trying to classify the F.horn as a woodwind just
because it's so commonly used in woodwind ensembles. The fact that varies
pitch through valves and harmonic overtones rather than toneholes, is just
too basic a difference to permit grouping them into the same
classification.



SMTPOriginator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
From: layers@cs.ust.hk
Subject: Chinese Virtuosi - Call for Works
PostedDate: 15-08-97 17:20:42
SendTo: CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH
ReplyTo: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
$UpdatedBy: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH,CN=Manuel op de Coul/OU=AT/O=EZH
RouteServers: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=notesrv1/OU=Server/O=EZH
RouteTimes: 15-08-97 17:20:47-15-08-97 17:20:47,15-08-97 17:18:55-15-08-97 17:18:56
DeliveredDate: 15-08-97 17:18:56
Categories:
$Revisions:

Received: from ns.ezh.nl by notesrv2.ezh.nl (Lotus SMTP MTA v1.1 (385.6 5-6-1997)) with SMTP id
C12564F4.00544A6C; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 17:20:40 +0200
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA08726; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 17:20:42 +0200
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 17:20:42 +0200
Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA08721
Received: (qmail 21478 invoked from network); 15 Aug 1997 15:20:33 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 15 Aug 1997 15:20:33 -0000
Message-Id: <199708151518.XAA09590@csnt1.cs.ust.hk>
Errors-To: madole@mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu