back to list

TUNING digest 1149

🔗John Starrett <jstarret@...>

8/11/1997 11:53:07 AM
On Thu, 7 Aug 1997 tuning@eartha.mills.edu wrote:

> From: Jakob Draminsky Hojmark <101710.2145@CompuServe.COM>
>
> Hi, does anybody on this list have a good system for notation of 19-ET and 31-ET
> in a way where you maintain the relation to the 12-ET pentagram?
>
> Jakob Draminsky Hojmark
> 101717.2145@compuserve.com

It depends. What is a 12-ET pentagram?

John Starrett



SMTPOriginator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
From: alves@orion.ac.hmc.edu
Subject: Re: Julian Carrillo
PostedDate: 12-08-97 02:27:23
SendTo: CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH
ReplyTo: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
$UpdatedBy: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH,CN=Manuel op de Coul/OU=AT/O=EZH
RouteServers: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=notesrv1/OU=Server/O=EZH
RouteTimes: 12-08-97 02:27:20-12-08-97 02:27:21,12-08-97 02:25:45-12-08-97 02:25:45
DeliveredDate: 12-08-97 02:25:45
Categories:
$Revisions:

Received: from ns.ezh.nl by notesrv2.ezh.nl (Lotus SMTP MTA v1.1 (385.6 5-6-1997)) with SMTP id
C12564F1.00027E2C; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 02:27:13 +0200
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA08156; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 02:27:23 +0200
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 02:27:23 +0200
Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA08359
Received: (qmail 11204 invoked from network); 11 Aug 1997 22:33:39 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 11 Aug 1997 22:33:39 -0000
Message-Id:
Errors-To: madole@mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu

🔗mr88cet@texas.net (Gary Morrison)

8/12/1997 7:02:28 AM
>Could we please avoid the term *quartertone* for anything but the unit of
>24-tET? As soon as you say a quartertone is the unit of 31-tET, you might
>as well use the term to describe any small interval

For whatever it's worth, I agree wholeheartedly.

But then again, I think that the term "syntonic comma" should be
reserved for 81:80! (That as opposed to it being the name for a
tuning-error mechanism that can have a different value for each different
tuning.)



SMTPOriginator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
From: stick@dnvr.uswest.net
Subject: microtones in Albuquerque
PostedDate: 12-08-97 19:09:57
SendTo: CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH
ReplyTo: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
$UpdatedBy: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=coul1358/OU=AT/O=EZH,CN=Manuel op de Coul/OU=AT/O=EZH
RouteServers: CN=notesrv2/OU=Server/O=EZH,CN=notesrv1/OU=Server/O=EZH
RouteTimes: 12-08-97 20:16:59-12-08-97 20:17:00,12-08-97 20:15:22-12-08-97 20:15:22
DeliveredDate: 12-08-97 20:15:22
Categories:
$Revisions:

Received: from ns.ezh.nl by notesrv2.ezh.nl (Lotus SMTP MTA v1.1 (385.6 5-6-1997)) with SMTP id
C12564F1.00646C3B; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 20:17:02 +0200
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA09050; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 19:09:57 +0200
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 19:09:57 +0200
Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA08899
Received: (qmail 13195 invoked from network); 12 Aug 1997 17:09:03 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 12 Aug 1997 17:09:03 -0000
Message-Id: <33F0981C.66CF@dnvr.uswest.net>
Errors-To: madole@mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu