Using Helmholtz as a reference (to what prime intervals are most consonant) he calls a "natural" scale C 1/1 0 cents D 9/8 204 Eb 6/5 316 E 5/4 386 F 4/3 498 (inversion of 3/2) G 3/2 702 Ab 8/5 814 (inv. maj3 5/4) A 5/3 884 (inv. min3 6/5) Bb 7/4 969 B 15/8 1088 (5/4 above G)
In regards to some postings on composing and using a more free intonation (likely sticking to those just thirds above on all chords) has there been much use of synths which have adjustable tuning maps for different tonalities, or even for every chord?
Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Thu, 22 May 1997 21:05 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA07905; Thu, 22 May 1997 21:05:41 +0200 Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 21:05:41 +0200 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA07908 Received: (qmail 29320 invoked from network); 22 May 1997 19:05:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 May 1997 19:05:36 -0000 Message-Id: <97052217575411/0005695065PK5EM@mcimail.com> Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
>Bill Alves wrote, > >>Given that there are seven pitches in the diatonic set, there are thus >>seven possible diatonic modes, of which major and minor are only two. I >>don't see how they are different than the other diatonic modes. > PErlich wrote:
>They are very different. The tritone (the only exception in the >classification of generic interval sizes according to 5-limit consonance) >is disjoint from the tonic triad in only these modes.
Of course all the diatonic modes have their own peculiarities and hence their musical uses. However, I was replying to a statement that major and minor are not "modes" like the "church modes" but are instead "keys." I don't think the fact that tonic triads in major and minor do not contain one of the tritone pitches distinguish them enough to require a completely different terminology. I posted my own defining characteristics of modes which I feel encompass all diatonic modes. I said that major and minor are not "different" in that they do not fall outside of that definition.
Bill
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ Bill Alves email: alves@hmc.edu ^ ^ Harvey Mudd College URL: http://www2.hmc.edu/~alves/ ^ ^ 301 E. Twelfth St. (909)607-4170 (office) ^ ^ Claremont CA 91711 USA (909)607-7600 (fax) ^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Thu, 22 May 1997 23:20 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA07953; Thu, 22 May 1997 23:20:32 +0200 Date: Thu, 22 May 1997 23:20:32 +0200 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA07954 Received: (qmail 13980 invoked from network); 22 May 1997 21:20:27 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 May 1997 21:20:27 -0000 Message-Id: <199705221716_MC2-1722-470D@compuserve.com> Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Paul Erlich is quite right in identifying the qualitative difference thatmajor and minor have with respect to the other diatonic modes when placedin a polyphonic voice leading situation. Among other things, the placement of the diminished fifth (_tritone_ ought to be saved for the pythagorean 729/512, on analogy with the ditone) allows for counterpoint with greaterfreedom for inverting voices, which becomes essential in tonal counterpoint, canon, and fugue. However, _melodically_ these modes function perfectly well when the melodic rules for the more traditional modes are followed (that is - Major as combination of mixolydian and lydian and minor as a combination dorian, phrygian and lydian). In fact, I thinka good case could be made for hearing early works in Major or minor as a kind of rapid _raga malaka_ where changes of harmony allow local melodic fragments to shift from one modal melodic type to another.
Although the study of musical intonation provides fertile ground for hearing these things flexibly, all too often the result is the opposite. I heard a lecture a decade or so ago by a famous African American composer and theorist who wanted to analyse _all music_ in terms of the lydian mode because it was the one where the the tonic coincided with the lowest termin a series of fifths. I pointed out that this was fine as a model for composition - and many fine compositions were made using his model - but could not be applied analytically to all music. In simple voice leading, the diminished fifth of the lydian mode would always resolve to the dominant and the Bach example he used simply didn't do this. The good professor responded: ''And that's where Bach went wrong...'' Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Fri, 23 May 1997 11:10 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA08329; Fri, 23 May 1997 11:10:23 +0200 Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 11:10:23 +0200 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA08288 Received: (qmail 16098 invoked from network); 23 May 1997 09:10:04 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 May 1997 09:10:04 -0000 Message-Id: Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Could somebody please explain modes (Dorian, Frigian, Aeolian, etc) to a newcomer on the list, or refer to literature explaining these?
Pieter Smit.
Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Tue, 27 May 1997 18:54 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA01518; Tue, 27 May 1997 18:54:37 +0200 Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 18:54:37 +0200 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA01516 Received: (qmail 8561 invoked from network); 27 May 1997 16:54:28 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 May 1997 16:54:28 -0000 Message-Id: <970527125219_453523594@emout11.mail.aol.com> Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
>Could somebody please explain modes (Dorian, Frigian, Aeolian, etc) to a >newcomer on the list, or refer to literature explaining these?
These are the proverbial "church modes" used in Gregorian chant and more recently in some forms of jazz, blues, and even a little in some popular music. They are the scales you get when you between a given pitch and the pitch an octave higher, but using only the white keys.
The scale from C to C using only white keys gives us the familiar "major" scale, which is also called the "Ionian" mode. A to A using only white keys gives you what we now call the "natural minor" mode, which is also called the "Aolean" mode.
These modes also have a set of older Greek names, but I confess that I don't know those names.
From: SMTP%"tuning@eartha.mills.edu" 29-MAY-1997 00:43:22.83 To: manuel.op.de.coul@ezh.nl CC: Subj: intemperate music
Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Thu, 29 May 1997 00:43 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA03250; Thu, 29 May 1997 00:43:20 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 00:43:20 +0200 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA03248 Received: (qmail 381 invoked from network); 28 May 1997 22:43:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 May 1997 22:43:16 -0000 Message-Id: <338C2815@fsdsmtpgw.fsd.jhuapl.edu> Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
>Could somebody please explain modes (Dorian, Frigian, Aeolian, etc) to a >newcomer on the list, or refer to literature explaining these?
The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians has an excellent description under "Mode". See also under "Tonality" for more on the difference between modes and keys.
Several of the articles in Music Theory Online also illuminate the distinction. Look around in http://boethius.music.ucsb.edu/mto/mtohome.html
Standard books on Western music history *ought* to have good descriptions, but many I've seen are very sparse on the pre-Baroque era.
Discussions tend to get thwarted by different usages of the word "mode". For example, Bill Alves appears to view modes as little more than types of scales. (They are very often described as such when an author is trying to be brief, perhaps the cause of the growing general impression that that's all there is to them.) Daniel Wolf sees modes in certain patterns of harmonization. I use the term as the composers themselves did when indicating that a composition is composed *in* a particular mode, as (for example) Merulo did with his toccatas. I believe this is how other Medieval and Renaissance writers used the term as well. This is analogous to saying that a Mozart piano sonata is *in* the key of C Major, but as the above articles show, there is an important musical difference.
My comment that started this off would be expressed more accurately, I think, as: Very few, if any, (Western classical) works have been written *in* a mode in the era of 12TET.
Gordon Collins
Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Fri, 30 May 1997 12:51 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA02215; Fri, 30 May 1997 12:51:08 +0200 Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 12:51:08 +0200 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA02212 Received: (qmail 19434 invoked from network); 30 May 1997 10:50:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 May 1997 10:50:42 -0000 Message-Id: Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
''Daniel Wolf sees modes in certain patterns of harmonization. ''
This is not so. Rather: I hear particular patterns of harmonization as a consequence of melodic modes. As Bill Alves says, Major and minor are modes of the common diatonic collection just as well as any others. Their historical prominence in the common practice era - as opposed to the prominence of other modes in other eras - is attributable to the particular suitability of the intervallic arrangement to harmonizations which can project the first degree of the major scale as a tonic over the duration of a piece. This is a fairly Schekerian statement, but as I noted in earlierpostings, I am also quite open to simultaneous interpretations of a work where local melodic behavior is suggestive of other modes - a ''Raga Malaka'' interpretation. Please note that my definition here is based upon major to allow for the characteristic ambiguity of the minor, which pivots between its own distinctive modal identity and one based upon the parallel major scale with chromatic modifications. The difficulty represented by this misunderstanding is similar to the problem that mid-Rennaisance theorists in had dealing with the definitionof modes when not all voices in a polyphonic setting started or ended on the final of the mode. Just because the thickened texture allowed for chords with more pitches, doesn't mean that a piece whose bass is in d dorian will have an alto in f lydian when the alto starts and ends on f. A close study of that alto voice will probably reveal motion that is uncharacteristic of a lydian melody. Counterpoint did indeed change the modes, but the distinctiveness of the modes was determinative in how actually counterpoint functioned.
In the common practice era, the rise of Major and minor corresponded generally with the substitution of transposition for modulation (in the sense of changing the melodic mode) as a means of generating tonal variety over the duration of a piece, with the melodic contrast between minor andMajor leading to two distinct ways of coloring harmonic progressions thatwere functionally identical. This was accompanied by a general change in the texture, towards a more homophonic arrangement of the voices, or rather one in which the inner voices were decidedly subservient to the outer. The striking cross relationships in Bach chorale harmonizations are one example of this. The net result is that although the material resources of these modes at the local level of a piece were not substantially different fromthose of earlier musics, the experience was quite distinct.
What, however, does this have directly do with tuning? I am afraid that the more I ponder the music of the common practice era, the closer I come to concluding that ''tonal music'' was composed with increasing disregard for precise tuning. And the increasingly indistinct tuning was used to represent or imply an increasingly broad harmonic language with unlimitedtransposition. Twelve tone and serial musics may even be worse off; a good friend of mine recalls visting the studios of many composers in the fifties - Boulez, Stockhausen, Nono among them - and all of them had out-of-tune pianos. The first broadcast of the complete _Lulu_ featured intermissionswith George Perle playing analytical examples on an instrument where almost every pitch had vibrato due to mistuned strings. In contrast, older musicis terribly sensitive to tuning. Simply playing dorian as d to d' on a just major C scale won't work due to the comma shy fifth d - a; in pythagoreanthe opposite is often the case due to the ditone above the tonic, resolution to which is demanded by the diminished fifth b - f. (A discussion of the benefits and disadvantages of out-of-tuneness might be worthwhile for this list...).
As to the general question of the survival of other modes in the tonal era: Sibelius's _Seventh_, or any of Debussy's lydian works should be sufficient - if late - counter-examples to the thesis that modal writing just stopped.
I wish to acknowlege that Harry Powers - author of the New Grove article on ''Mode and Melodic Type'' - greatly influenced my thinking on these issues during his guest professorship at my graduate school. My definition of key does differ from his but does so by going to a fairly radical reduction (a group of seven consecutive members from a chain of fifths, with chromaticsubstitutions in the minor borrowed from the parallel Major). I find thisdefinition will be true for a wider repertoire than that defined in Groveand also one that is closer to the practices of notating and keyboarding,which are certainly signs and symptoms of the conceptual framework underlying the system. Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Fri, 30 May 1997 21:56 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA05200; Fri, 30 May 1997 21:56:04 +0200 Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 21:56:04 +0200 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA05202 Received: (qmail 636 invoked from network); 30 May 1997 18:49:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 May 1997 18:49:24 -0000 Message-Id: <199705301437_MC2-178E-6CF2@compuserve.com> Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sorry for the delayed response, but Gordon Collins wrote:
>Discussions tend to get thwarted by different usages of the word "mode". For >example, Bill Alves appears to view modes as little more than types of >scales. (They are very often described as such when an author is trying to >be brief, perhaps the cause of the growing general impression that that's all >there is to them.)
This is not true. I outlined my defining characteristics reasonably clearly, I think. A scale is a representation of the pitches in a mode arranged in ascending or descending order from tonic to tonic. (There are also, of course, non-modal scales like the "chromatic scale" and "whole-tone scale.")
As for whether a mode is "little more than" what can be representated by a scale, that all depends on the time and place and what one supposes a scale represents. As I said, in different times and places, the concept of mode might also include a range, characteristic melodic motives, and so on.
I had earlier written:
>>Well, right now I have my synth tuned in a very interesting 11-limit >>lattice, and when I play the white keys from C to C it certainly doesn't >>sound like any kind of major scale I would recognize. > >What you've got there is not a major scale. But a major scale is a major >scale is a major scale whether a whole tone is 9/8, 10/9, (5/4)^(1/2), >2^(1/6), or something in between. > >Or whether the scale is 1/1 9/8 44/35 4/3 3/2 176/105 66/35 2/1.
My point was to counter an earlier claim I had thought you made:
>The distinction between n-limit JI, x-comma meantone, well-temperament, and >12TET is *totally irrelevant* to the definition of modes and scales!
with a counter-example. Of course it's not a major scale, because the tuning system no longer makes it recognizably diatonic.
>Your idea of "recognizably diatonic" is interesting, and deserves >quantification. As in, "What is the ideal and how far from it can a scale be >to be recognized as diatonic?" > Yes, it would be interesting to quantify such an effect (like Blackwood), but I'm not a psychologist, so I'll have to leave it to someone else.
>But treating 3-limit JI and 12TET as variations within the same tuning >system.... Well, I have the definite impression that most list contributors >consider them to be fundamentally different. > As would I, but I never claimed that pythagorean and 12TET were "variations" of the same tuning system. I think that subsets of both can reasonably represent diatonic modes.
>The point is, those augmented sixth chord arcana are more important *to >understanding the music* than are the details of the tuning.
I think that all depends on the music. I think the value of tuning knowledge for the understanding of music is greatly underrated in general. (As Lou Harrison says: You haven't heard a piece until you've heard it in the tuning that the composer intended or expected.) An intimate knowledge of augmented sixth chords is likewise pretty useless in the understanding of Partch, Indian music, or medieval music (even in the Renaissance and Baroque augmented sixth chords are not that important).
My snide reference was meant to be a jab at conventional college "music theory" curricula, which are really common-practice harmony courses -- courses that thus concentrate nearly exclusively on one dimension of one type of music. To those students who unquestionably accept 12TET as the words of the Prophet, an understanding of tuning systems is, I think, just as valuable as how to resolve a Neapolitan sixth chord, if not more so.
Bill
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^ Bill Alves email: alves@hmc.edu ^ ^ Harvey Mudd College URL: http://www2.hmc.edu/~alves/ ^ ^ 301 E. Twelfth St. (909)607-4170 (office) ^ ^ Claremont CA 91711 USA (909)607-7600 (fax) ^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 19:14 +0200 Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA11081; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 19:13:57 +0200 Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 19:13:57 +0200 Received: from ella.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA07086 Received: (qmail 14282 invoked from network); 3 Jun 1997 17:13:17 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ella.mills.edu) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Jun 1997 17:13:17 -0000 Message-Id: <199706031256_MC2-17C4-196D@compuserve.com> Errors-To: madole@mills.edu Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu