back to list

RE: Paul Erlich's "tonalness" algorithm

🔗PAULE <ACADIAN/ACADIAN/PAULE%Acadian@...>

1/2/1997 4:35:45 PM
Thanks to Brian for a fine summary of the historical developments in the
theory of pitch perception. I certainly agree that the issue is complex and
that we are very far from understanding the complexities of the ear-brain
system. However, this from Brian himself:

>Among the three popular pitch theories only
>the optimum processor theory [Goldstein's]
>is able to account for most of the data
>[in] a quantitative sense.

It is no coincidence that I chose to highlight, and cite results from,
Goldstein's work, and only mentioned Terhardt and Wightmann due to some
overall similarities between their theories. Goldstein's theory can be
viewed as a first approximation to the problem, to which corrections will no
doubt be added by more sophisticated theories. In trying to understand Van
Eck's work, I carefully studied Goldstein's paper and found that the form of
Goldstein's theory was strongly suggested by the data, and was not merely a
preconceived construct to which the data was fitted. This impressed me
enough to inspire a reconstruction and correction of Van Eck's procedure,
which is the "algorithm" I posted. It seems a simple enough construct to
merit consideration, especially where no reasonable alternatives are
apparant. Far too many writers on tuning, etc. interpret chords cavalierly
and end up unknowingly contradicting themselves. A first step is to
recognize that any SWNR interval will tolerate some mistuning. A second step
is to attempt a consistent description of how an arbitrary interval will be
heard. This is what I have done, and although refinements are no doubt
possible, much useful information can be gleaned from this model.


Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl
with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Fri, 3 Jan 1997 02:04 +0100
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA01098; Fri, 3 Jan 1997 02:07:32 +0100
Received: from eartha.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA01096
Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
for id RAA14058; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 17:07:30 -0800
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 17:07:30 -0800
Message-Id: <199701022005_MC1-E20-4A58@compuserve.com>
Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu