pure or just

Haverstick here...Morrison's comments on correct terminology are right
on...that's why "just" has no meaning for me as applied to
tunings...pure, as I use it, means primal, unaltered, perfect...which is
exactly what the notes in the harmonic series are...am I missing
something? Also, where is Danielou missing the boat as regards his
interpretation of Indian music? Again, who really knows? Anybody on this
forum? Because I think the points raised lately concerning the
connection between tunings, music, and larger "Metaphysical" issues are
very important, and should be pursued. In a similar vein, the Martians
in Mars Attacks were destroyed by Slim Whitman's music...is this is
what's meant by Shiva the Destroyer? Hstick




Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl
with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Tue, 31 Dec 1996 11:11 +0100
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA05699; Tue, 31 Dec 1996 11:14:34 +0100
Received: from eartha.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA05697
Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
for id CAA11819; Tue, 31 Dec 1996 02:14:31 -0800
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 02:14:31 -0800
Message-Id: <199612310512_MC2-E20-D5BC@compuserve.com>
Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu