back to list

HOW TO CHANGE 12 BY MICROTONALISM

🔗Eduardo Sabat-Garibaldi <esabat@...>

11/20/1996 4:09:35 AM
HOW TO CHANGE 12 BY MICROTONALISM.

To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu

Gary Morrison <71670.2576@CompuServe.COM>

> If I'm reading this correctly, and perhaps I'm not, this "dynamic music" is
> essentially the same idea what I've heard "wandering tonics" (which I
somewhat
> apologize for mentioning again, since it is one of my areas of interest for
> me, and I don't want to sound like I'm obsessed with the idea to the
> exclusion of all else).

Gary : Would you tell me the T.D. numbers where you mention the "wandering
tonics" ?
---------------------------------------

We are at least two the ones who are obsessed. I would like to know how many
other T.D.'fans are also obsessed. That would be very interesting. I suposse
many of them, and it's my desire that exactly all of the members were
obsessed.

And Why ?

Because the unic way to convince the world that ALL MUSIC IS MICROTONAL is to
get everybody in "resonance", ( and even better without heterodyne sounds
:)> ).

The "12" is a cultural break for the reality of music.
I believe that everything, or almost everything is ready for this big jump.
The history of future music will remember that we the Tuning-Lister
through the magic of e-mail communication were the arrowheads that changed and
replaced the "12" by "Microtonalism".
I always explain to my friends that it's a lie that the foundation of western
music was 12tET and that piano does not rule the reality or the theory.

In how many different ways can the piano be tuned ?
- The answer is very simple - As many times as tuners tune them.
----------------------------------------

The next sentence is my Trojan Horse for this topic.

"The 12 notes of the Octave may be denominated in 35 different manners, they
are writen in the pentagram with more than 350 symbols and all of this for at
least 36 notes-frequency that are used but aren't writen.".!?!?!?
Then I am the madman ... I say, perhaps not enough, but anyway it helps...


Eduardo

Received: from ns.ezh.nl [137.174.112.59] by vbv40.ezh.nl
with SMTP-OpenVMS via TCP/IP; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 16:03 +0100
Received: by ns.ezh.nl; (5.65v3.2/1.3/10May95) id AA00713; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 16:05:22 +0100
Received: from eartha.mills.edu by ns (smtpxd); id XA00711
Received: from by eartha.mills.edu via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
for id HAA05016; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 07:05:19 -0800
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 07:05:19 -0800
Message-Id: <961120150030_71670.2576_HHB62-10@CompuServe.COM>
Errors-To: madole@ella.mills.edu
Reply-To: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Originator: tuning@eartha.mills.edu
Sender: tuning@eartha.mills.edu