Re: [metatuning] Digest Number 1196

I didn't think it was a great OR terrible movie. I was intrigued by the more neuroscientific questions, like, is it possible by habit to shut down the cellular receptors for certain food-supplied nutrients and neurochemicals, etc.?

And how much of neuroscience is getting CLOSE to understanding that there may be "spiritual", ie emotional and intellectual, causes of things like autism, ADD/ADHD, and Alzheimer's? And that "artistic" ie emotional and intellectual therapies may represent the real "cures", as opposed to drugs, etc.???

metatuning@yahoogroups.com wrote:

There are 2 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1. what the bleep do we know?
From: "akjmicro"
2. Re: what the bleep do we know?
From: Kraig Grady

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I didn't think it was teriible , just disapointing.
remember clockwork orange and what happens when you 'cure' someone, they lose interest in the good thing too.
And Marquez is wise enough to always show how such attributes go together.
Where would we be if someone would have cured Harry Partch
i question the validity of these deceases. The most pychiotic desease i see in manic happiness. and it is in epidemic proportions.
attention deficent. Just what is there to pay attention to out there anyways
Pete McRae wrote:

>I didn't think it was a great OR terrible movie. I was intrigued by the more neuroscientific questions, like, is it possible by habit to shut down the cellular receptors for certain food-supplied nutrients and neurochemicals, etc.? > >And how much of neuroscience is getting CLOSE to understanding that there may be "spiritual", ie emotional and intellectual, causes of things like autism, ADD/ADHD, and Alzheimer's? And that "artistic" ie emotional and intellectual therapies may represent the real "cures", as opposed to drugs, etc.???
> >
>metatuning@yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
>
>There are 2 messages in this issue.
>
>Topics in this digest:
>
>1. what the bleep do we know?
>From: "akjmicro" >2. Re: what the bleep do we know?
>From: Kraig Grady >
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>________________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>Meta Tuning meta-info:
>
>To unsubscribe, send an email to:
>metatuning-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>Web page is http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/metatuning/
>
>To post to the list, send to
>metatuning@yahoogroups.com
>
>You don't have to be a member to post.
>
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> >

--
Kraig Grady
North American Embassy of Anaphoria Island <http://anaphoria.com/>
The Wandering Medicine Show
KXLU <http://www.kxlu.com/main.html> 88.9 FM Wed 8-9 pm Los Angeles

--- In metatuning@yahoogroups.com, Kraig Grady <kraiggrady@a...>
wrote:
> I didn't think it was teriible , just disapointing.
> remember clockwork orange and what happens when you 'cure'
someone,
> they lose interest in the good thing too.
> And Marquez is wise enough to always show how such attributes go
together.
> Where would we be if someone would have cured Harry Partch
> i question the validity of these deceases. The most pychiotic
desease i
> see in manic happiness. and it is in epidemic proportions.
> attention deficent. Just what is there to pay attention to out
there
> anyway?

Your music for one ;)

Which reminds me...I still want to buy your new hammer dulcimer CD
and/or trade CD's...I've been busy lately, but I want to burn
something for you and send it off soon...

-Aaron.