back to list

Patriot act

🔗Manuel Op de Coul <coul@...>

11/22/2004 8:29:05 AM

Here's what leaked out from "Patriot" Act II, brrr.
http://s93763503.onlinehome.us/html/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=180

Manuel

🔗Carl Lumma <clumma@...>

11/22/2004 10:30:04 AM

> Here's what leaked out from "Patriot" Act II, brrr.
> http://s93763503.onlinehome.us/html/modules.php?
> name=News&file=article&sid=180

This news is almost two years old.

-Carl

🔗Carl Lumma <clumma@...>

11/22/2004 10:32:51 AM

> > Here's what leaked out from "Patriot" Act II, brrr.
> > http://s93763503.onlinehome.us/html/modules.php?
> > name=News&file=article&sid=180
>
> This news is almost two years old.

Here's the EFF's analysis...

http://www.eff.org/Censorship/Terrorism_militias/patriot-act-II-
analysis.php

or

http://tinyurl.com/aby7

Note that it stalled before it even got started.

-Carl

🔗Carl Lumma <clumma@...>

11/22/2004 10:36:50 AM

> Here's the EFF's analysis...
>
> http://www.eff.org/Censorship/Terrorism_militias/patriot-act-II-
> analysis.php
>
> or
>
> http://tinyurl.com/aby7
>
> Note that it stalled before it even got started.

Though at the time my feeling was, it was intentionally made
so outlandishly unpassable to make the stuff that did go
through seem like a compromise, and generally soften things
up for the future.

-Carl

🔗Manuel Op de Coul <coul@...>

11/22/2004 1:00:34 PM

>Though at the time my feeling was, it was intentionally made
>so outlandishly unpassable to make the stuff that did go
>through seem like a compromise, and generally soften things
>up for the future.

Yeah, could be so indeed. But not a safe bet I think (either way).

Manuel