information may theoretically escape from black hole

http://www.nature.com/news/2004/040712/full/040712-12.html

"Manuel Op de Coul" <coul@e...> wrote:
> http://www.nature.com/news/2004/040712/full/040712-12.html

See, that's why I don't like them as a basis for
things like the Holographic Principle.

-Carl

> > http://www.nature.com/news/2004/040712/full/040712-12.html
>
> See, that's why I don't like them as a basis for
> things like the Holographic Principle.

Slashdot linked to newscientist, where there were slightly
(but hardly) more details. Apparently nobody knows details
yet, as the press release has preceded Hawking's talk.

A google news search for Beckenstein returns nothing about
black holes. I'll be anxious to see if Hawking's result
has any bearing on that bound.

-Carl

> See, that's why I don't like them as a basis for
> things like the Holographic Principle.

Yes, as I understand it the entropy bound of black holes
serves as a physical illustration of this mathematical
principle.
Well, will be interesting to follow if Hawking's result
sheds any more light on this, albeit from my very superficial
point of view.

>A google news search for Beckenstein returns nothing about
>black holes.

Try Bekenstein.

Manuel

> Yes, as I understand it the entropy bound of black holes
> serves as a physical illustration of this mathematical
> principle.
> Well, will be interesting to follow if Hawking's result
> sheds any more light on this, albeit from my very superficial
> point of view.
>
> >A google news search for Beckenstein returns nothing about
> >black holes.
>
> Try Bekenstein.

Nothing.

-Carl