back to list

Peter

🔗Kalle Aho <kalleaho@...>

12/11/2003 11:21:16 AM

In case someone is wondering why I posted my question to Peter in
tuning and not here:

As far as I know Peter Wakefield Sault is not (yet) reading
metatuning and at the time of the question he didn't probably even
know that such a thing exists. That's why I posted my question to
tuning so that Peter would be able to answer the question!

Of course I could've posted the question on metatuning and then
invited Peter to join metatuning but would that really have been
better?

Kalle

🔗Carl Lumma <clumma@...>

12/11/2003 12:15:17 PM

> Of course I could've posted the question on metatuning and then
> invited Peter to join metatuning but would that really have been
> better?

What would have been better is for you to contact him privately,
and perhaps made your case here.

Mark has shown up and given Gene and I (and maybe others) some
moderator powers. If Sault or anybody else drops one rascist
remark he's history.

This buggerzion. I've made it so he can't post without moderator
approval, turned off his ability to post files, and written him
privately asking him what his interest in tuning is.

-Carl

🔗Kalle Aho <kalleaho@...>

12/11/2003 3:20:56 PM

--- In metatuning@yahoogroups.com, "Carl Lumma" <clumma@y...> wrote:
> > Of course I could've posted the question on metatuning and then
> > invited Peter to join metatuning but would that really have been
> > better?
>
> What would have been better is for you to contact him privately,
> and perhaps made your case here.

Possibly.

> Mark has shown up and given Gene and I (and maybe others) some
> moderator powers. If Sault or anybody else drops one rascist
> remark he's history.

That's great news. But remember: power corrupts. :)

> This buggerzion. I've made it so he can't post without moderator
> approval, turned off his ability to post files, and written him
> privately asking him what his interest in tuning is.
>
> -Carl

Good!