latest Fisk editorial

http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=95825

In a message dated 9/25/01 12:51:24 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
dante.interport@... writes:

> http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=95825
>
>

So, the U.S. is more interested in its own terrorists, rather than those that
affected others. Already Hamas has stopped suicide bombers. And the author
left out India which has these same concerns. Should we question why Fisk
left out India?

Regarding Sharon, he was never my favorite. Is Fisk suggesting that since we
trained Bin Laden that he should be allowed free rein? When Sharon left
southern Lebanon there was a terrible attack by Israeli trained Lebanese.
When Israel withdrew from Lebanon under Barak, these Lebanese in a later
generation were attacked by children of those survivors and their friends.
Maybe Barak can be better blamed for his involvement in the killings.

I don't buy what Fisk is selling. The world can achieve gain with U.S.
policy in rooting out terrorism.

Johnny Reinhard

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]