Re: [metatuning] Digest Number 10

You can't run away from problems going from back up group to back up
group
postponing what needs to be done
Maybe you might consider that Jacky pulled the plug because it was
becoming a platform for Brian attacks. It sounds like it you think that it
was the the victims of his attacks that were the problem asking for his
banning. (I was not one ,i merely unsubscribed when he became incoherent).

"X. J. Scott" wrote:

> The last thing I'm looking for is to be a target for
> every one's hate mail cos I won't ban this or that person.
> We haven't heard from Jacky yet, perhaps he has
> gone on vacation, but I would imagine all the stress
> of getting all the banning requests and such is
> what caused him to pull the plug, assuming that's
> what happened.
>
> Anyway, trouble like that I don't need!
>
> - Jeff
>
> Meta Tuning meta-info:
>
> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> metatuning-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Web page is http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/metatuning/
>
> To post to the list, send to
> metatuning@yahoogroups.com
>
> You don't have to be a member to post.
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

-- Kraig Grady
North American Embassy of Anaphoria island
http://www.anaphoria.com

The Wandering Medicine Show
Wed. 8-9 KXLU 88.9 fm

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Jeff,

--- In metatuning@y..., "X. J. Scott" <xjscott@e...> wrote:
> Nothing! Just set your email filters to reject the posts
> of anyone you don't like.

This completely ignores the 'problems' of those of us who wish to
receive the list in digest form. In this case, I get huge digests
with only a few messages, all because one person can't get a point
across in a few, well-written sentences. Nope, they have to write
100k of cruft.

In this case, filters are _not_ an answer (unfortunately)...

Cheers,
Jon

Jon Szanto wrote:

> --- In metatuning@y..., "X. J. Scott" <xjscott@e...> wrote:
> > Nothing! Just set your email filters to reject the posts
> > of anyone you don't like.
>
> This completely ignores the 'problems' of those of us who wish to
> receive the list in digest form. In this case, I get huge digests
> with only a few messages, all because one person can't get a point
> across in a few, well-written sentences. Nope, they have to write
> 100k of cruft.

And those of us who have to suck everything through a 56k modem, and
pay for the call.

Graham