back to list

Re: 29 to Paul

🔗Paul Erlich <paul@...>

10/3/2001 4:27:19 PM

--- In MakeMicroMusic@y..., jacky_ligon@y... wrote:
> --- In MakeMicroMusic@y..., "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote:
> > This is a Utonal or subharmonic series, and the 29 is irrelevant -
-
> > you would get exactly the same intervals if you substituted your
> > phone number for 29.
>
> Paul,
>
> This I do not understand.
>
> I do not see that if I substitute other Primes

Primeness has nothing to do with it.

> that is gives
> *exactly* the same intervals.
>
> In fact they are totally different, with some near convergences.
>
> What do you mean here?

I mean the intervals _between_ the notes. If you take two of the
notes, 29/A and 29/B, the interval between them is B/A. Now if you
substitute all the 29's with, say, pi, then the notes are pi/A and
pi/B, and the interval between them is, again, B/A.

🔗nanom3@...

10/3/2001 4:45:25 PM

I mean the intervals _between_ the notes. If you take two of the
notes, 29/A and 29/B, the interval between them is B/A. Now if you
substitute all the 29's with, say, pi, then the notes are pi/A and
pi/B, and the interval between them is, again, B/A.

> pi/B, and the interval between them is, again, B/A.

thanks Paul. I find it very helpful when you actually give the
general math formula you are using to support your statements.
Otherwise I tend to get a bit lost in the details and miss the big
obvious stuff.

()nly 98 more belief systems to go and I'll be ready for tuning -
math:-)

Mary