Re: [MMM] the MMM/Tuning List distinction.

Aaron wrote...

> I'm getting a little disturbed, however, that the Tuning List vibe of
> math/theory issues is becoming the prevalent 'gestalt' even over here on
> MMM, where I used to love to come for a breath of non-technical fresh air,

Yeah, lemme echo that. The list traffic has jumped way up (April more than
quadrupled over March), and a lot of it is starting to get pretty
theoretical and not tied to pieces or examples of music. Folks, if you're
going to delve into theory and make assertions about things like Phi,
please all take Margo's lead and provide an audible example.

> And now McLaren has stirred up a nasty vibe at metatuning as well.

And I'm wondering why the heck that keeps gets mentioned here? I can
understand that Gene must be really fuming over McLaren's posts over there,
but really... Why bring it here? McLaren isn't posting here, and as far as
I know isn't listening here, so let's not discuss here the feud that's
happening over there. People who want it can go there to get it.

Rick