Orwell thing

Seeing as Orwell's on the breeze, I decided to rustle up my
sequencer, and record an improvisation, so that I could
edit the bad bits out in a seamless manner. Then I decided
not to bother, and recorded directly to an audio file,
which means there are seams from where I edited out the
worse bits. I also broke my resolution to avoid chords on
the grounds of them complicating matters. Here are the
results:

http://x31eq.com/music/consanguineous.mp3

Ends suddenly.

Graham

I like that you included the chords. This echos a estampie in my mind - very
nice!
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/193277/estampie

Which Orwell is this?

Chris

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Graham Breed <gbreed@...> wrote:

>
>
> Seeing as Orwell's on the breeze, I decided to rustle up my
> sequencer, and record an improvisation, so that I could
> edit the bad bits out in a seamless manner. Then I decided
> not to bother, and recorded directly to an audio file,
> which means there are seams from where I edited out the
> worse bits. I also broke my resolution to avoid chords on
> the grounds of them complicating matters. Here are the
> results:
>
> http://x31eq.com/music/consanguineous.mp3
>
> Ends suddenly.
>
> Graham
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Chris Vaisvil <chrisvaisvil@...> wrote:
> I like that you included the chords. This echos a
> estampie in my mind - very nice!
> http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/193277/estampie

That's the same as an estampida, is it? I've got the Dufay
Collective album but I haven't listened to it for a long
time.

> Which Orwell is this?

! orwell12_rms.scl
!
12 note Orwell scale, TOP-RMS tuning
12
114.353
157.210
271.563
385.916
! note from Orwell13 omitted 428.773
543.126
657.479
700.335
814.689
929.042
971.898
1086.251
1200.604