17 ET Jazz

17 ET Jazz

This is a hybrid performance / scored microtonal piece using Kontakt 3, pianoteq, sonar 8.5, and a Korg MS2000 as a midi controller.

Kontakt contributes drums, upright bass, sax section, and trumpet.

Pianoteq 2.3 contributes the jazz piano.

The drums were scored first, bass second and then other instruments played along with that. The goal was to keep the composition to 60 seconds or less since this is a submission to the Chicago 60×60 event (not selected at this time).

The main motive is a 17 ET analog to a suspended 4th to major 3rd in common practice 12 edo tuning.

http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.mp3

http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.ogg

Excellent Chris! The best I've heard from you so far and the
best 60x60 submission I've heard so far (I've only heard a few).

-Carl

At 11:57 AM 2/6/2010, you wrote:
>17 ET Jazz
>
>This is a hybrid performance / scored microtonal piece using Kontakt
>3, pianoteq, sonar 8.5, and a Korg MS2000 as a midi controller.
>
>Kontakt contributes drums, upright bass, sax section, and trumpet.
>
>Pianoteq 2.3 contributes the jazz piano.
>
>The drums were scored first, bass second and then other instruments
>played along with that. The goal was to keep the composition to 60
>seconds or less since this is a submission to the Chicago 60×60 event
>(not selected at this time).
>
>The main motive is a 17 ET analog to a suspended 4th to major 3rd in
>common practice 12 edo tuning.
>
>
>http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.mp3
>
>http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.ogg
>

Does it have a title? Or just "4001-1 ver 2"?

-C.

At 11:57 AM 2/6/2010, you wrote:
>17 ET Jazz
>
>This is a hybrid performance / scored microtonal piece using Kontakt
>3, pianoteq, sonar 8.5, and a Korg MS2000 as a midi controller.
>
>Kontakt contributes drums, upright bass, sax section, and trumpet.
>
>Pianoteq 2.3 contributes the jazz piano.
>
>The drums were scored first, bass second and then other instruments
>played along with that. The goal was to keep the composition to 60
>seconds or less since this is a submission to the Chicago 60×60 event
>(not selected at this time).
>
>The main motive is a 17 ET analog to a suspended 4th to major 3rd in
>common practice 12 edo tuning.
>
> http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.mp3
> http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.ogg
>

I'm calling it 17ET Jazz

didn't feel a snazzy title this time.

Thanks for the listen and comment! I'm glad you liked it!

On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Carl Lumma <carl@...> wrote:

>
>
> Does it have a title? Or just "4001-1 ver 2"?
>
> -C.
>
>
> At 11:57 AM 2/6/2010, you wrote:
> >17 ET Jazz
> >
> >This is a hybrid performance / scored microtonal piece using Kontakt
> >3, pianoteq, sonar 8.5, and a Korg MS2000 as a midi controller.
> >
> >Kontakt contributes drums, upright bass, sax section, and trumpet.
> >
> >Pianoteq 2.3 contributes the jazz piano.
> >
> >The drums were scored first, bass second and then other instruments
> >played along with that. The goal was to keep the composition to 60
> >seconds or less since this is a submission to the Chicago 60×60 event
> >(not selected at this time).
> >
> >The main motive is a 17 ET analog to a suspended 4th to major 3rd in
> >common practice 12 edo tuning.
> >
> > http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.mp3
> > http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.ogg
> >
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Great music, great sound! :D Listened to this a couple of times on the trot and it's so enjoyable!

Sean

--- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com, "christopherv" <chrisvaisvil@...> wrote:
>
> 17 ET Jazz
>
> This is a hybrid performance / scored microtonal piece using Kontakt 3, pianoteq, sonar 8.5, and a Korg MS2000 as a midi controller.
>
> Kontakt contributes drums, upright bass, sax section, and trumpet.
>
> Pianoteq 2.3 contributes the jazz piano.
>
> The drums were scored first, bass second and then other instruments played along with that. The goal was to keep the composition to 60 seconds or less since this is a submission to the Chicago 60×60 event (not selected at this time).
>
> The main motive is a 17 ET analog to a suspended 4th to major 3rd in common practice 12 edo tuning.
>
>
> http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.mp3
>
> http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.ogg
>

Thank you very much Sean!!

On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 3:47 PM, sevishmusic <sevish@...> wrote:

>
>
> Great music, great sound! :D Listened to this a couple of times on the trot
> and it's so enjoyable!
>
> Sean
>
>
> --- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com <MakeMicroMusic%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "christopherv" <chrisvaisvil@...> wrote:
> >
> > 17 ET Jazz
> >
> > This is a hybrid performance / scored microtonal piece using Kontakt 3,
> pianoteq, sonar 8.5, and a Korg MS2000 as a midi controller.
> >
> > Kontakt contributes drums, upright bass, sax section, and trumpet.
> >
> > Pianoteq 2.3 contributes the jazz piano.
> >
> > The drums were scored first, bass second and then other instruments
> played along with that. The goal was to keep the composition to 60 seconds
> or less since this is a submission to the Chicago 60×60 event (not selected
> at this time).
> >
> > The main motive is a 17 ET analog to a suspended 4th to major 3rd in
> common practice 12 edo tuning.
> >
> >
> > http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.mp3
> >
> > http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.ogg
> >
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

christopherv wrote:
> 17 ET Jazz
> > This is a hybrid performance / scored microtonal piece using Kontakt
> 3, pianoteq, sonar 8.5, and a Korg MS2000 as a midi controller.
> > Kontakt contributes drums, upright bass, sax section, and trumpet.
> > Pianoteq 2.3 contributes the jazz piano.
> > The drums were scored first, bass second and then other instruments
> played along with that. The goal was to keep the composition to 60
> seconds or less since this is a submission to the Chicago 60×60
> event (not selected at this time).
> > The main motive is a 17 ET analog to a suspended 4th to major 3rd in
> common practice 12 edo tuning.

Nice! I like the sound of the harmonies in the sax section.

Thank you for the listen and comment Herman!

On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Herman Miller <hmiller@...> wrote:

>
> >
> > The main motive is a 17 ET analog to a suspended 4th to major 3rd in
> > common practice 12 edo tuning.
>
> Nice! I like the sound of the harmonies in the sax section.
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Perhaps not the greatest finish, but quite interesting nevertheless!

Oz.

✩ ✩ ✩
www.ozanyarman.com

On Feb 6, 2010, at 9:57 PM, christopherv wrote:

> 17 ET Jazz
>
> This is a hybrid performance / scored microtonal piece using Kontakt
> 3, pianoteq, sonar 8.5, and a Korg MS2000 as a midi controller.
>
> Kontakt contributes drums, upright bass, sax section, and trumpet.
>
> Pianoteq 2.3 contributes the jazz piano.
>
> The drums were scored first, bass second and then other instruments
> played along with that. The goal was to keep the composition to 60
> seconds or less since this is a submission to the Chicago 60×60
> event (not selected at this time).
>
> The main motive is a 17 ET analog to a suspended 4th to major 3rd in
> common practice 12 edo tuning.
>
>
> http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.mp3
>
> http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.ogg
>
>

O Carl,

Have you perchance listened to my very own East Dreams West?

Oz.

✩ ✩ ✩
www.ozanyarman.com

On Feb 6, 2010, at 10:11 PM, Carl Lumma wrote:

> Excellent Chris! The best I've heard from you so far and the
> best 60x60 submission I've heard so far (I've only heard a few).
>
> -Carl
>
> At 11:57 AM 2/6/2010, you wrote:
>> 17 ET Jazz
>>
>> This is a hybrid performance / scored microtonal piece using Kontakt
>> 3, pianoteq, sonar 8.5, and a Korg MS2000 as a midi controller.
>>
>> Kontakt contributes drums, upright bass, sax section, and trumpet.
>>
>> Pianoteq 2.3 contributes the jazz piano.
>>
>> The drums were scored first, bass second and then other instruments
>> played along with that. The goal was to keep the composition to 60
>> seconds or less since this is a submission to the Chicago 60×60
>> event
>> (not selected at this time).
>>
>> The main motive is a 17 ET analog to a suspended 4th to major 3rd in
>> common practice 12 edo tuning.
>>
>>
>> http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.mp3
>>
>> http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.ogg
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

How would you have wrote the the ending?

On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...>wrote:

>
>
> Perhaps not the greatest finish, but quite interesting nevertheless!
>
> Oz.
>
> ✩ ✩ ✩
> www.ozanyarman.com
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2010, at 9:57 PM, christopherv wrote:
>
> > 17 ET Jazz
> >
> > This is a hybrid performance / scored microtonal piece using Kontakt
> > 3, pianoteq, sonar 8.5, and a Korg MS2000 as a midi controller.
> >
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Ozan wrote:
>Perhaps not the greatest finish, but quite interesting nevertheless!

I rather liked the finish. Thought it wrapped up really nicely
to the 60s mark.

>O Carl,
>
>Have you perchance listened to my very own East Dreams West?

I have. I must have liked it because it's here in my files.
I listened again just now, and I do like it. It's very effective
in the tuning, but it still sounds more like it was sourced
from 12 than Chris' piece. It also has too much reverb.
Chris' piece is not a masterwork or anything, but he found a
cute little thing in 17 and effectively presented it in 60s.

-Carl

Chris,
Nice work! Great showcase for 17 EDO. It has a nice falling down a hill feeling, as the descending changes go not quite as far as they would with 12 EDO, leaving a real sense of unease. Nicely answered by going back up the same distance.

Prent Rodgers

--- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com, "christopherv" <chrisvaisvil@...> wrote:
>
> 17 ET Jazz
>
> The main motive is a 17 ET analog to a suspended 4th to major 3rd in common practice 12 edo tuning.
>
>
> http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.mp3
>
> http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/17-ET/60x60-4001-1-ver2.ogg
>

Thank you Prent for the listen and comment.

Are you referring to the pseudo sus 4th to maj 3rd motive?

Chris

On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 1:23 PM, prentrodgers <prentrodgers@...>wrote:

>
>
> Chris,
> Nice work! Great showcase for 17 EDO. It has a nice falling down a hill
> feeling, as the descending changes go not quite as far as they would with 12
> EDO, leaving a real sense of unease. Nicely answered by going back up the
> same distance.
>
> Prent Rodgers
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]