72 EDO notation in Sagittal

Does this representation look right? I remember I had it wrong with 53 EDO last time, and I'd like to make sure I get the Sagittal accidentals correct.

http://bumpermusic.blogspot.com/2009/05/72-edo-sagittal.html

Prent Rodgers

Prent Rodgers wrote:
> Does this representation look right? I remember I had it wrong with
> 53 EDO last time, and I'd like to make sure I get the Sagittal
> accidentals correct.
> > http://bumpermusic.blogspot.com/2009/05/72-edo-sagittal.html

It's too hard to read without a magnifying glass (and even then not very readable), but those notes around C can't all be C natural.

The regular 72-ET Sagittal notation is like this:

0 C
1 C/|
2 C|)
3 C/|\
4 C||)
5 C||\
6 C/||\ D\!!/
7 D!!/
8 D!!)
9 D\!/
10 D!)
11 D\!
12 D
etc.

--- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com, "Prent Rodgers" <prentrodgers@...> wrote:
>
> Does this representation look right? I remember I had it wrong with 53 EDO last time, and I'd like to make sure I get the Sagittal accidentals correct.
>
> http://bumpermusic.blogspot.com/2009/05/72-edo-sagittal.html
>
> Prent Rodgers

Hi Prent,

There are some significant problems with what you have there. I suggest that you look at the full-page diagram (Fig. 3) on the next-to-last page of my XH18 article about the Miracle temperament and decimal keyboard:

http://anaphoria.com/SecorMiracle.pdf

The notation for many of the ratios you want are shown, and there is also a full sequence of symbols (from double-flat to double-sharp) given at the bottom right.

--George