Re: MMM Day submissions

At 09:02 AM 4/5/2006, you wrote:
>Carl,
>
>My most abject apologies for this unwarranted e-mail, but Jacob Barton indicated that submissions for MMM Day were to be sent to you, and I wanted to confirm this before sending you any mp3 files. Question: are submissions limited to a single entry, or can more be submitted? I wasn't sure, just thought I'd ask.
>
>:-)
>
>jl

Yes, you may send them to my gmail address (clumma@...), or
better, put them on the web somewhere. FLAC format would be best,
but mp3 and ogg are OK. I'd say 1 per person, to keep quality high
and play time fair. If you want to send 2-3 and let me pick, I'm
happy to do so.

I'd like to know what Prent needs for his broadcast. Individual
files, not a mix, right? Or... I guess I don't know what the mix
is for. But I can make it.

-Carl

Carl,

{you wrote...}
>FLAC format would be best, but mp3 and ogg are OK.

I've hardly ever used FLAC. Do you have a specific set of options (i.e. quality, etc) that you'd like to specify, or ???

That is, if I get anything finished!

Cheers,
Jon

On 4/5/06, Jon Szanto <jszanto@cox.net> wrote:
> I've hardly ever used FLAC. Do you have a specific set of options (i.e. quality, etc) that you'd like to specify, or ???
>
> That is, if I get anything finished!

The L in FLAC is for "lossless", which means there's only one quality,
the best possible.

Keenan

>Carl,
>
>{you wrote...}
>>FLAC format would be best, but mp3 and ogg are OK.
>
>I've hardly ever used FLAC. Do you have a specific set of options
>(i.e. quality, etc) that you'd like to specify, or ???

Any will work.

>That is, if I get anything finished!

Good luck!

-Carl

>The L in FLAC is for "lossless", which means there's only one quality,
>the best possible.
>
>Keenan

There are different compression options.

-Carl

Keenan,

{you wrote...}
>The L in FLAC is for "lossless", which means there's only one quality, the best possible.

Ah, yes, I understand that, but their documentation lists 9 levels of compression. Which is why I asked if Carl had a preference...

Cheers,
Jon

--- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com, Jon Szanto <jszanto@...> wrote:
>
> Carl,
>
> {you wrote...}
> >FLAC format would be best, but mp3 and ogg are OK.
>
> I've hardly ever used FLAC. Do you have a specific set of options
(i.e. quality, etc) that you'd like to specify, or ???
>
> That is, if I get anything finished!

I don't even know what the hell we are supposed to do.

Gene,

{you wrote...}
>I don't even know what the hell we are supposed to do.

You mean write a piece of music, or how to encode it? AFAIK, this is just submit a short piece for a compilation.

Cheers,
Jon

--- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com, Carl Lumma <ekin@...> wrote:
>
> Yes, you may send them to my gmail address (clumma@...), or
> better, put them on the web somewhere. FLAC format would be best,
> but mp3 and ogg are OK. I'd say 1 per person, to keep quality high
> and play time fair. If you want to send 2-3 and let me pick, I'm
> happy to do so.

More than fair play time, I would push for maximal surface variety in
the mix ("see, microtonal music isn't a style or particular sound"
etc. etc.), and for this reason I would suggest allowing multiple
submissions so long as their processes/instrumentation/soundworlds are
different enough. But if I'm the only one planning to do that...

-Jacob

(If you missed the original message,
http://xenharmonic.wikispaces.com/MMMday06

--- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com, Jon Szanto <jszanto@...> wrote:
>
> Gene,
>
> {you wrote...}
> >I don't even know what the hell we are supposed to do.
>
> You mean write a piece of music, or how to encode it?

I don't know what kind of music we are looking for, or how long it
might be, or whether or not it was supposed to be original for this
compilation. I also don't think it makes sense to give us a week to do
it in.

To Jacob and all: please note the last point!

Gene,

{you wrote...}
>I don't know what kind of music we are looking for

Microtonal?

>... or how long it might be

Use your best judgement, I guess. I'd prefer pieces on the short side, to make it so someone doesn't get stuck in one piece and then give up on the rest.

>... or whether or not it was supposed to be original for this compilation.

I figure that might be best, but if not original, it should sound definitely different in a new guise. It doesn't sound like this is a good place for a subtle use of a temperament for an early keyboard piece, for example.

>I also don't think it makes sense to give us a week to do it in.

Absolutely! Jacob - since we not only don't have "dozens" but fewer than 12 (potential participants), and you are adverting the thing as a massive compilation, how about if you set a new "day", and we can all get our ducks in a row? I think that putting the best possible collection together would be important for this first MMM Day, rather than hitting a deadline (I frankly don't think I'm going to make it, due to work and life issues). If we do more in the future, it will be a better springboard if the first is well-represented and of as high a quality and variety as we can possibly muster.

Just my $.02.

Cheers,
Jon

>Absolutely! Jacob - since we not only don't have "dozens" but fewer
>than 12 (potential participants), and you are adverting the thing as a
>massive compilation, how about if you set a new "day", and we can all
>get our ducks in a row?

Too much procrastination on this list (I'm the worst offender).
Gene, why not see what you can do in a week? Might be a good
composition exercise.

-Carl

Hi Jon,

On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 Carl Lumma wrote:
>
> At 09:02 AM 4/5/2006, you [Jon L Smith] wrote:
> >Carl,
> >
> >My most abject apologies for this unwarranted e-mail, but Jacob
> Barton indicated that submissions for MMM Day were to be sent to
> you, and I wanted to confirm this before sending you any mp3
> files. Question: are submissions limited to a single entry, or
> can more be submitted? I wasn't sure, just thought I'd ask.
> >
> >:-)
> >
> >jl
>
> Yes, you may send them to my gmail address (clumma@...), or
> better, put them on the web somewhere. FLAC format would be best,
> but mp3 and ogg are OK. I'd say 1 per person, to keep quality high
> and play time fair. If you want to send 2-3 and let me pick, I'm
> happy to do so.
>
> I'd like to know what Prent needs for his broadcast. Individual
> files, not a mix, right? Or... I guess I don't know what the mix
> is for. But I can make it.
>
> -Carl

Could you mix me up "Bunga Seroja" in Pythagorean,
with your samples? Umm, just realised that that's
very short order. Not to worry!

Regards,
Yahya

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.5/302 - Release Date: 5/4/06

MMM Day? Hmm, i missed the memo! Can someone please fill me in ?
TAI, dantheclueless

--- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com, "Yahya Abdal-Aziz" <yahya@...>
wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 Carl Lumma wrote:
> >
> > At 09:02 AM 4/5/2006, you [Jon L Smith] wrote:
> > >Carl,
> > >
> > >My most abject apologies for this unwarranted e-mail, but Jacob
> > Barton indicated that submissions for MMM Day were to be sent to
> > you, and I wanted to confirm this before sending you any mp3
> > files. Question: are submissions limited to a single entry, or
> > can more be submitted? I wasn't sure, just thought I'd ask.
> > >
> > >:-)
> > >
> > >jl
> >
> > Yes, you may send them to my gmail address (clumma@...), or
> > better, put them on the web somewhere. FLAC format would be best,
> > but mp3 and ogg are OK. I'd say 1 per person, to keep quality
high
> > and play time fair. If you want to send 2-3 and let me pick, I'm
> > happy to do so.
> >
> > I'd like to know what Prent needs for his broadcast. Individual
> > files, not a mix, right? Or... I guess I don't know what the mix
> > is for. But I can make it.
> >
> > -Carl
>
>
> Could you mix me up "Bunga Seroja" in Pythagorean,
> with your samples? Umm, just realised that that's
> very short order. Not to worry!
>
> Regards,
> Yahya
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.5/302 - Release Date:
5/4/06
>

Microtonalists

I plan to assemble a podcast on Saturday and Sunday of 3-5 minute
examples of as many people's music as I can find. In the interest of
diversity and inclusion of as many people as possible, I'll edit the
submitted pieces to 3-5 minutes. I plan to read 3-4 sentences about
each one before it plays, so a podcatcher like me, who listens on a
walk in the dark, can understand what they are about the hear. The
podcast site will have links to every web site I know of. Here's what
I have so far, and I'm open to anything and everything, 3-5 minutes
with a 3-4 sentence description. No complete works please. No
paragraph on the back that would take over 30 seconds to read. Just
the facts mam. Send it to me or Carl. I'll put what I get into the
podcast. Or two, depending on how much I get.

Chuckk Hubbard biggiantharp.mp3 - Grabs you from the first 10 seconds
and never lets go

FMscape1.mp3 - I can't remember where I found this, but it's great
stuff - I'll play the first 3 minutes of it unless I hear otherwise.

Gene Ward Smith dreyfus new font.mp3 - I plan to take the first 5
minutes. Sit back and be ready to get bathed in microtonality.

Jacob Barton funwithxenharmonicity+hyperimprovisationtasty.mp3 - I
haven't had a chance to listen at real time speed to this, but I like
the 2x. Have to cut it at 4:30 or so to allow more in. And what
follows is even better...

Untravelled Path sweetheresy-sampler.mp3 - nice acoustic bass finger
piano work - came in through Jeff Harrington's reblog
http://hollowtreestudios.blogspot.com/2006/03/review-sweet-heresy-by-untravelled.html

one of these: Bill Sethares clariphonicsgroup2.mp3 -
Bill Sethares clariphonicsgroup2b.mp3
Bill Sethares clariphonicsgroup4.mp3 - help me choose.

Arthur B. Hunkins Iterum.mp3 - awesome drone - I think it came in on
the Csound list, but it's definitely microtonal. Wait for the 3:00
minute mark before making a decision. And the last 30 seconds are
transcendent.

Bill Sethares MysteryX.mp3 "Peter Gunn" meets "The Man with the
English Horn"

Dave Seidel DriftDhikr2.mp3 - terrific. Or I might pick:
Dave Seidel Threnody.mp3 - What do you think?

Christopher Bailey balladei.mp3 - Wonderful live performance. Only
Chris could have pulled it off. I'm planning to start at 2:00 and cut
out at 6:00 with a pointer to the full thing.

- I have to pick one of these. Any recommendations:
jon_lyle_smith-Ud_And_Nay.mp3
jon_lyle_smith-Ocean_Of_Fire.mp3
jon_lyle_smith-Dream_In_Overdrive.mp3
jon_lyle_smith-Piano_And_Trio_In_D.mp3
jon_lyle_smith-Quincunx.mp3

Jeff-Harrington-Spirale_dArco_for_Saxophone_Quartet.mp3 - not all that
microtonal, but terrific anyway - so sue me.

Prent Rodgers - One or two of my recent 30-60 second fragments from
the bumper music podcast. http://bumpermusic.blogspot.com .

If you want in on the next big podcast, send me a link to your piece
(3-5 minutes) on a web site, or email to micro.podcast@.... And
include a 3-4 sentence description of what you did. Technique, tuning,
tools, psyche, whatever. Send it to Carl too! Or either one of us.

Prent

>
> Yes, you may send them to my gmail address (clumma@gmail.com), or
> better, put them on the web somewhere. FLAC format would be best,
> but mp3 and ogg are OK. I'd say 1 per person, to keep quality high
> and play time fair. If you want to send 2-3 and let me pick, I'm
> happy to do so.
>
> I'd like to know what Prent needs for his broadcast. Individual
> files, not a mix, right? Or... I guess I don't know what the mix
> is for. But I can make it.
>
> -Carl
>

http://xenharmonic.wikispaces.org/MMMDay06

> Gene writes:
> >I don't know what kind of music we are looking for
>
> Microtonal?

I apologize for being unclear about this. It's a struggle to actually
communicate anything on this sort of forum, and when that's combined
with my preference for brevity and posting-with-caution...well, we
have confusion.

MMM day is first and foremost anything you think it should be. It has
become centered around this Saturday (April 8, 2006) as a target for
producing a podcast, but I don't see why the festivities can't be
extended to whenever is convenient for you, since this "community" is
so asynchronized by its very nature. We could have a second deadline
in a week for an additional podcast. No need to fret; I don't want
this to be a bother to anyone, nor do I want anyone excluded by the
very design of the event.

> >... or whether or not it was supposed to be original for this
compilation.
>
> I figure that might be best, but if not original, it should sound
definitely different in a new guise. It doesn't sound like this is a
good place for a subtle use of a temperament for an early keyboard
piece, for example.

I dunno, as long as it's microtonal (Johnny Reinhard includes all
music under this umbrella) and you're *making* it, should be fine.

>
> >I also don't think it makes sense to give us a week to do it in.
>

Not a week, but a day! was the original thought. A frenetic flourish
of activity. But that's what works for me, what works for you?

In response to Jon's $.02, we gotta keep the day, it's too close to
chicken out now! But in the way of making a polished representation
of the community out of this, perhaps Saturday can be a
beginning-point rather than a deadline.

My most sincere apologies for seeming to step on people's toes,
disorganization, poetic idealism, etc.

>> I'd like to know what Prent needs for his broadcast. Individual
>> files, not a mix, right? Or... I guess I don't know what the mix
>> is for. But I can make it.

>If you want in on the next big podcast, send me a link to your piece
>(3-5 minutes) on a web site, or email to micro.podcast@.... And
>include a 3-4 sentence description of what you did. Technique, tuning,
>tools, psyche, whatever. Send it to Carl too! Or either one of us.

Uh, sounds like you need individual files. So I'm not sure what
good it'd do to send it to me. (I volunteered to make a continuous,
cross-faded thingy at somebody's suggestion.)

-Carl

Carl,

{you wrote...}
>Too much procrastination on this list (I'm the worst offender).

Give me a f***ing break. There is no reason for any one of us to *not* see what we could do in a week, or a day, or an hour. But when it gets announced in such short notice, the Grand Cosmos Plan of Life Issues may just not have that week/day/hour available for something like making music. There might be something of a more potent import.

You - of all people, which you acknowledge - don't have any right to point fingers. And I know you meant it as a prod to Gene (or others) but your judgement isn't appreciated.

Jon

>Carl,
>
>{you wrote...}
>>Too much procrastination on this list (I'm the worst offender).
>
>Give me a f***ing break.

Dude, chill.

-Carl

{you wrote...}
>Dude, chill.

I'll try - life is stressful right now. I'll expect a piece from you, then, as well? If not, don't throw those non-12tet stones...

Jon

Jacob wrote:

> MMM day is first and foremost anything you think it should be. It has
> become centered around this Saturday (April 8, 2006) as a target for
> producing a podcast, but I don't see why the festivities can't be
> extended to whenever is convenient for you, since this "community" is
> so asynchronized by its very nature. We could have a second deadline
> in a week for an additional podcast. No need to fret; I don't want
> this to be a bother to anyone, nor do I want anyone excluded by the
> very design of the event.

My thought was to record any old rubbish on the day, just to be part of a community making music. Now the talk's about aiming for quality, and making it a serious compilation. Should I bother? I don't have the equipment to record anything good, quickly.

> I dunno, as long as it's microtonal (Johnny Reinhard includes all
> music under this umbrella) and you're *making* it, should be fine.

Doesn't it have to be deliberately tuned by his definition. What if I record something in whatever scale my flute plays? (Probably a boring one.)

Graham

On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 J.Smith wrote:
>
> --- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com, "Prent Rodgers"
> <prentrodgers@...> wrote:
>
> > - I have to pick one of these. Any recommendations:
> > jon_lyle_smith-Ud_And_Nay.mp3
> > jon_lyle_smith-Ocean_Of_Fire.mp3
> > jon_lyle_smith-Dream_In_Overdrive.mp3
> > jon_lyle_smith-Piano_And_Trio_In_D.mp3
> > jon_lyle_smith-Quincunx.mp3
>
> > Prent
>
>
> I prefer "Quincunx", but would choose "Piano And Trio" as an
> alternative. The rest aren't worth considering -- they were the
> results of learning to use the Orion Pro demo software.
>
> :-)

If Jon hadn't spoken up on his own behalf,
I was going to recommend "Dream in Overdrive".
Prent, consider this a vote from one of Jon's
fans ... :-)

Regards,
Yahya

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.5/302 - Release Date: 5/4/06

Hi Prent,

Thanks for including me. I have two other possibilities as well.

There's my latest published thing, "Drift Dhikr II" (http://mysterybear.net/article/19/drift-dhikr-ii), which is only 5 minutes.

But maybe even better, I also have something entirely different: "Sunday Afternoon", which is a piece of (gasp) tonal chamber music. I put this one out a few days ago as a MIDI retuning/rendering challenge here and on the Tuning list. So far, I have a very nice version from JLSmith that I think would be good in the podcast: http://mysterybear.net/files/SUndayAFternoon-(JLSmith).mp3 (duration 3:06). (I'm hoping to have versions from Charles Lucy and perhaps a couple of other people soon, but I'm happy enough with Jon's version to submit it.)

- Dave

Prent Rodgers wrote:
> Microtonalists
> > I plan to assemble a podcast on Saturday and Sunday of 3-5 minute
> examples of as many people's music as I can find. In the interest of
> diversity and inclusion of as many people as possible, I'll edit the
> submitted pieces to 3-5 minutes. I plan to read 3-4 sentences about
> each one before it plays, so a podcatcher like me, who listens on a
> walk in the dark, can understand what they are about the hear. The
> podcast site will have links to every web site I know of. Here's what
> I have so far, and I'm open to anything and everything, 3-5 minutes
> with a 3-4 sentence description. No complete works please. No
> paragraph on the back that would take over 30 seconds to read. Just
> the facts mam. Send it to me or Carl. I'll put what I get into the
> podcast. Or two, depending on how much I get.
> > Chuckk Hubbard biggiantharp.mp3 - Grabs you from the first 10 seconds
> and never lets go
> > FMscape1.mp3 - I can't remember where I found this, but it's great
> stuff - I'll play the first 3 minutes of it unless I hear otherwise.
> > Gene Ward Smith dreyfus new font.mp3 - I plan to take the first 5
> minutes. Sit back and be ready to get bathed in microtonality.
> > Jacob Barton funwithxenharmonicity+hyperimprovisationtasty.mp3 - I
> haven't had a chance to listen at real time speed to this, but I like
> the 2x. Have to cut it at 4:30 or so to allow more in. And what
> follows is even better...
> > Untravelled Path sweetheresy-sampler.mp3 - nice acoustic bass finger
> piano work - came in through Jeff Harrington's reblog > http://hollowtreestudios.blogspot.com/2006/03/review-sweet-heresy-by-untravelled.html
> > one of these: Bill Sethares clariphonicsgroup2.mp3 -
> Bill Sethares clariphonicsgroup2b.mp3
> Bill Sethares clariphonicsgroup4.mp3 - help me choose.
> > Arthur B. Hunkins Iterum.mp3 - awesome drone - I think it came in on
> the Csound list, but it's definitely microtonal. Wait for the 3:00
> minute mark before making a decision. And the last 30 seconds are
> transcendent.
> > Bill Sethares MysteryX.mp3 "Peter Gunn" meets "The Man with the
> English Horn" > > Dave Seidel DriftDhikr2.mp3 - terrific. Or I might pick:
> Dave Seidel Threnody.mp3 - What do you think?
> > Christopher Bailey balladei.mp3 - Wonderful live performance. Only
> Chris could have pulled it off. I'm planning to start at 2:00 and cut
> out at 6:00 with a pointer to the full thing. > > - I have to pick one of these. Any recommendations:
> jon_lyle_smith-Ud_And_Nay.mp3
> jon_lyle_smith-Ocean_Of_Fire.mp3
> jon_lyle_smith-Dream_In_Overdrive.mp3
> jon_lyle_smith-Piano_And_Trio_In_D.mp3
> jon_lyle_smith-Quincunx.mp3
> > Jeff-Harrington-Spirale_dArco_for_Saxophone_Quartet.mp3 - not all that
> microtonal, but terrific anyway - so sue me.
> > Prent Rodgers - One or two of my recent 30-60 second fragments from
> the bumper music podcast. http://bumpermusic.blogspot.com . > > If you want in on the next big podcast, send me a link to your piece
> (3-5 minutes) on a web site, or email to micro.podcast@.... And
> include a 3-4 sentence description of what you did. Technique, tuning,
> tools, psyche, whatever. Send it to Carl too! Or either one of us.
> > Prent > >> Yes, you may send them to my gmail address (clumma@...), or
>> better, put them on the web somewhere. FLAC format would be best,
>> but mp3 and ogg are OK. I'd say 1 per person, to keep quality high
>> and play time fair. If you want to send 2-3 and let me pick, I'm
>> happy to do so.
>>
>> I'd like to know what Prent needs for his broadcast. Individual
>> files, not a mix, right? Or... I guess I don't know what the mix
>> is for. But I can make it.
>>
>> -Carl
>>
> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > >

--- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com, Dave Seidel <dave@...> wrote:
So far, I have a very nice version from JLSmith
> that I think would be good in the podcast:
> http://mysterybear.net/files/SUndayAFternoon-(JLSmith).mp3 (duration
> 3:06).

This doesn't seem to work.

My mistake, the link should be

http://mysterybear.net/files/SundayAfternoon-JLSmith.mp3

Thanks, Gene.

- Dave

Gene Ward Smith wrote:
> --- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com, Dave Seidel <dave@...> wrote:
> So far, I have a very nice version from JLSmith >> that I think would be good in the podcast: >> http://mysterybear.net/files/SUndayAFternoon-(JLSmith).mp3 (duration >> 3:06).
> > This doesn't seem to work.
> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > >

>>Dude, chill.
>
>I'll try - life is stressful right now. I'll expect a piece from you,
>then, as well? If not, don't throw those non-12tet stones...
>
>Jon

Jon, my comment wasn't directed at you. No, don't reply. Take a
walk in your neighborhood or something.

-Carl

>My thought was to record any old rubbish on the day, just to be part of
>a community making music. Now the talk's about aiming for quality, and
>making it a serious compilation. Should I bother? I don't have the
>equipment to record anything good, quickly.

I think that's a great idea, Graham. So far all the submissions I've
received have been previously-released here on MMM.

-Carl

Carl Lumma wrote:
>>My thought was to record any old rubbish on the day, just to be part of >>a community making music. Now the talk's about aiming for quality, and >>making it a serious compilation. Should I bother? I don't have the >>equipment to record anything good, quickly.
> > > I think that's a great idea, Graham. So far all the submissions I've
> received have been previously-released here on MMM.

Here you go then:

http://microtonal.co.uk/music/MMMDay.mp3

I used Csound in the end, with existing instruments, so not that bad. I overran the 7th local time, but only for the post-processing. I think the music-making date was the 7th. It uses an ssssL pentatonic scale with different tunings.

Graham

Here's what I have so far. If you want me to include your piece not
listed here, send it to me at micro.podcast@.... I'm going to
try to finish it up this afternoon before the kids get home from
school and wonder what daddy is doing talking into a microphone.

Here's the current list, and I have to freeze it for now, but I could
make another one Sunday.

Anthony Kozar FMscape1.mp3
Arthur B. Hunkins Iterum.mp3
Bill Sethares clariphonicsgroup2.mp3
Bill Sethares clariphonicsgroup2b.mp3
Bill Sethares clariphonicsgroup4.mp3
Bill Sethares MysteryX.mp3
Carl Lumma eikosany.mp3
Chris Bryan a_great_crossing.mp3
Christopher Bailey balladei.mp3
Chuckk Hubbard biggiantharp.mp3
daniel_anthony_stearns_-_day_walks_in.mp3
Dave Seidel DriftDhikr2.mp3
Gene Ward Smith dreyfus new font.mp3
Gene Ward Smith dreyfus.mp3
Hans Straub asimchomsaia_ogg.wav
Jacob Barton funwithxenharmonicity+hyperimprovisationtasty.mp3
Jeff-Harrington-Spirale_dArco_for_Saxophone_Quartet.mp3
Joe Monzo - Theme from Invisible Haircut.mp3
jon_lyle_smith-Piano_And_Trio_In_D.mp3
jon_lyle_smith-Quincunx.mp3
jon_lyle_smith-Wind_Rider.mp3
Magnus Jonsson and Jim Redfern - Anticperience.mp3
Margo Schulter InHoraObservationis.mp3
Podcast1024 Background.mp3
Prent Rodgers TrumpetSong5.mp3
Prent Rodgers TrumpetSong6.mp3
Rick McGowan 5min-sym-15tet.mp3
Rozencrantz the Sane Nothing of Any Importance_ogg.wav
scraps_of_paper.mp3
Yahya Abdal-Aziz Bunga Seroja.mp3

Carl, if you have others, let me know.

> If you want in on the next big podcast, send me a link to your piece
> (3-5 minutes) on a web site, or email to micro.podcast@... And
> include a 3-4 sentence description of what you did. Technique, tuning,
> tools, psyche, whatever. Send it to Carl too! Or either one of us.
>
> Prent
>
> >

-Got it!

Prent
> Here you go then:
>
> http://microtonal.co.uk/music/MMMDay.mp3
>
> I used Csound in the end, with existing instruments, so not that
bad. I
> overran the 7th local time, but only for the post-processing. I think
> the music-making date was the 7th. It uses an ssssL pentatonic scale
> with different tunings.
>
>
> Graham
>

At 09:52 AM 4/7/2006, you wrote:
>Carl Lumma wrote:
>>>My thought was to record any old rubbish on the day, just to be part of
>>>a community making music. Now the talk's about aiming for quality, and
>>>making it a serious compilation. Should I bother? I don't have the
>>>equipment to record anything good, quickly.
>>
>>
>> I think that's a great idea, Graham. So far all the submissions I've
>> received have been previously-released here on MMM.
>
>Here you go then:
>
>http://microtonal.co.uk/music/MMMDay.mp3

Great, now everybody can listen in and spoil their surprise. :(

-C.

Well, it's been 24 hours, and my message about midi -> wav
rendering still hasn't shown up on the web, or been delivered. :(

-C.