Re: [MMM] My music online

Nice. There's no link from
http://hcoop.net/~magnus/
however.

-C.

At 08:15 PM 4/4/2006, you wrote:
>Hi, I have put up some of my music online, together with some comments on
>the tunings used. For those interested:
>
>http://hcoop.net/~magnus/music/
>
>If you want to link to that page, that's fine. I will try to keep this
>page permanent and I will be adding new material there too.
>
>- Magnus Jonsson

Thanks for looking at it Carl! I just set the page up so it's still a bit bare bones. There's no link to anyone elses site yet but I'd be happy to keep a collection of links to other people's microtonal music. Does that answer your concern? Or did I misunderstand completely? --Magnus

On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Carl Lumma wrote:

> Nice. There's no link from
> http://hcoop.net/~magnus/
> however.
>
> -C.
>
> At 08:15 PM 4/4/2006, you wrote:
>> Hi, I have put up some of my music online, together with some comments on
>> the tunings used. For those interested:
>>
>> http://hcoop.net/~magnus/music/
>>
>> If you want to link to that page, that's fine. I will try to keep this
>> page permanent and I will be adding new material there too.
>>
>> - Magnus Jonsson
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

You misunderstood completely. :)

There's textual mention of your music page from your main page
http://hcoop.net/~magnus/
right above another link, but it isn't a link itself. Doesn't
that seem a bit odd?

Or are you waiting to perfect your art before linking to your
main page?

-Carl

At 11:39 PM 4/4/2006, you wrote:
>Thanks for looking at it Carl! I just set the page up so it's still a bit
>bare bones. There's no link to anyone elses site yet but I'd be happy to
>keep a collection of links to other people's microtonal music. Does that
>answer your concern? Or did I misunderstand completely? --Magnus
>
>On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Carl Lumma wrote:
>
>> Nice. There's no link from
>> http://hcoop.net/~magnus/
>> however.
>>
>> -C.
>>
>> At 08:15 PM 4/4/2006, you wrote:
>>> Hi, I have put up some of my music online, together with some comments on
>>> the tunings used. For those interested:
>>>
>>> http://hcoop.net/~magnus/music/
>>>
>>> If you want to link to that page, that's fine. I will try to keep this
>>> page permanent and I will be adding new material there too.
>>>
>>> - Magnus Jonsson
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Carl Lumma wrote:

> You misunderstood completely. :)

:) I had the feeling I did.

> There's textual mention of your music page from your main page
> http://hcoop.net/~magnus/
> right above another link, but it isn't a link itself. Doesn't
> that seem a bit odd?

Oh.. It is actually a link ("Music page") but I admit that's probably a little unclear. I will make the whole text a link. Thanks.

> Or are you waiting to perfect your art before linking to your
> main page?

Not at all. If I waited until my art was perfect I'd have to wait for a loong time :)

Btw, is there some "prior art" regarding tempering out 513/512?

-MJ

--- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com, Magnus Jonsson <magnus@...> wrote:

> Btw, is there some "prior art" regarding tempering out 513/512?

{2, 3, 19} instead of {2, 3, 5}? The first et to look at for that is
12 equal, and there's a bit of prior at involved with that. If you
want something other than just 2, 3, and 19, 65-et would be a possibility.

>> You misunderstood completely. :)
>
>:) I had the feeling I did.
>
>> There's textual mention of your music page from your main page
>> http://hcoop.net/~magnus/
>> right above another link, but it isn't a link itself. Doesn't
>> that seem a bit odd?
>
>Oh.. It is actually a link ("Music page") but I admit that's probably
>a little unclear. I will make the whole text a link. Thanks.

Ah, what's happening here is that it didn't, and still doesn't
display in ie. Probably because you have an unclosed <li
there. For once, ff is more forgiving.

>> Or are you waiting to perfect your art before linking to your
>> main page?
>
>Not at all. If I waited until my art was perfect I'd have to wait
>for a loong time :)
>
>Btw, is there some "prior art" regarding tempering out 513/512?

What scale did you use? Like Gene, I thought of 12.

-Carl

On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Carl Lumma wrote:

> Ah, what's happening here is that it didn't, and still doesn't
> display in ie. Probably because you have an unclosed <li
> there. For once, ff is more forgiving.

Yes that must be it :). I've fixed it now. Cheers!
- Magnus

At 01:47 AM 4/5/2006, you wrote:
>On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Carl Lumma wrote:
>
>> Ah, what's happening here is that it didn't, and still doesn't
>> display in ie. Probably because you have an unclosed <li
>> there. For once, ff is more forgiving.
>
>Yes that must be it :). I've fixed it now. Cheers!
>- Magnus

Sweet!

Dude, if you're in Delaware, it's, um, late. :)

-Carl

On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Carl Lumma wrote:

> What scale did you use? Like Gene, I thought of 12.

It's simply a chain of 11 fifths, each fifth having a ratio of
3/2 * (512/513)^3 so that three fifths down produces 19/16. This is a very gentle tempering that leave fifths very close to just while adding some JI style locking to the minor triads. The fifths are sharper than 12edo but narrower than 3/2. The wolf fifth is "acceptable".

On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Carl Lumma wrote:

> Dude, if you're in Delaware, it's, um, late. :)
>
> -Carl

Gah! You got me!
Ok. I'm heading to bed :)

On 4/5/06, Magnus Jonsson <magnus@smartelectronix.com> wrote:
> It's simply a chain of 11 fifths, each fifth having a ratio of
> 3/2 * (512/513)^3 so that three fifths down produces 19/16. This is a
> very gentle tempering that leave fifths very close to just while adding
> some JI style locking to the minor triads. The fifths are sharper than
> 12edo but narrower than 3/2. The wolf fifth is "acceptable".

Very interesting. When I get home I'll try this out with some
intermodulation distortion.

Keenan

--- In MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com, Magnus Jonsson <magnus@...> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Carl Lumma wrote:
>
> > What scale did you use? Like Gene, I thought of 12.
>
> It's simply a chain of 11 fifths, each fifth having a ratio of
> 3/2 * (512/513)^3

By which you mean 3/2 * (512/513)^(1/3), of course. This leads to a
fifth of 700.829, less than a cent from 12-et. It has a schismic major
third seven cents sharp and a schismic minor third of 8192/6859, which
is eight cents flat. These thirds are, of course, perfectly usable also.