back to list

Paul - harmonic entropy, circa 1998?

🔗traktus5 <kj4321@...>

6/4/2004 6:33:15 PM

hi Paul. I googled your concept, and only got Joe Monzo's dialogue
about your ideas (at tonalsoft.com), c. 1998, but wasn't sure if
there's a newer exposition on the matter you can refer me to, and
where it might be in the 700 messages at harmonicic entropy list, or
elsewhere. thanks! Kelly

🔗wallyesterpaulrus <wallyesterpaulrus@...>

6/10/2004 5:29:45 PM

--- In harmonic_entropy@yahoogroups.com, "traktus5" <kj4321@h...>
wrote:
> hi Paul. I googled your concept, and only got Joe Monzo's
dialogue
> about your ideas (at tonalsoft.com), c. 1998, but wasn't sure if
> there's a newer exposition on the matter you can refer me to, and
> where it might be in the 700 messages at harmonicic entropy list,
or
> elsewhere. thanks! Kelly

Hi Kelly!

This is really brief, but it might make a great jumping-off point for
further discussion:

http://www.soundofindia.com/showarticle.asp?in_article_id=111

Cheers,
Paul

🔗Carl Lumma <ekin@...>

6/10/2004 5:39:27 PM

>Hi Kelly!
>
>This is really brief, but it might make a great jumping-off point
for
>further discussion:
>
>http://www.soundofindia.com/showarticle.asp?in_article_id=111
>
>Cheers,
>Paul

Congrats on this article, Paul! Would you mind if I linked to it
from...

http://www.lumma.org/tuning/erlich/

...?

-Carl

🔗traktus5 <kj4321@...>

6/11/2004 9:03:07 AM

Hi Paul. Am studying your article, and will respond. I was also
wondering if there is any more material regarding your 1998 theory
(which I read at Tonalsoft.com) that sonance is comprised of the
values of prime numbers and (seperately) by the exponents...?
thanks, Kelly

🔗wallyesterpaulrus <wallyesterpaulrus@...>

6/11/2004 1:06:42 PM

--- In harmonic_entropy@yahoogroups.com, "Carl Lumma" <ekin@l...>
wrote:
> >Hi Kelly!
> >
> >This is really brief, but it might make a great jumping-off point
> for
> >further discussion:
> >
> >http://www.soundofindia.com/showarticle.asp?in_article_id=111
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Paul
>
> Congrats on this article, Paul! Would you mind if I linked to it
> from...
>
> http://www.lumma.org/tuning/erlich/
>
> ...?
>
> -Carl

Good idea. Thanks.

🔗wallyesterpaulrus <wallyesterpaulrus@...>

6/11/2004 1:08:10 PM

--- In harmonic_entropy@yahoogroups.com, "traktus5" <kj4321@h...>
wrote:

> Hi Paul. Am studying your article, and will respond. I was also
> wondering if there is any more material regarding your 1998 theory
> (which I read at Tonalsoft.com) that sonance is comprised of the
> values of prime numbers and (seperately) by the exponents...?
> thanks, Kelly

This sounds like Monz's theory (which he never got more specific on),
not mine. You may be reading Monz's words as mine, and my words as
his, on the webpage you're looking at. Take a more careful look and
tell me what you see.

🔗Carl Lumma <ekin@...>

6/11/2004 1:12:57 PM

>> Congrats on this article, Paul! Would you mind if
>> I linked to it from...
>>
>> http://www.lumma.org/tuning/erlich/
>>
>> ...?
>
>Good idea. Thanks.

Done.

-Carl

🔗traktus5 <kj4321@...>

6/11/2004 3:53:45 PM

Paul- you're right. His words, not yours. Sorry. In my hastily
printed version, his sentence "...Erlich is here providing" made me
think he was refering to the preceding section --his on prime numbers-
- and not yours --on place and periodicy -- to which he was actually
refering.

The theory seemed quite differenct from your other work, so it caught
my attention (and, made me jump and think, 'Hey! then what about my
theory on triangular numbers and chord energy!')

(In a printed version,--- In
harmonic_entropy@yahoogroups.com, "wallyesterpaulrus"
<wallyesterpaulrus@y...> wrote:
> --- In harmonic_entropy@yahoogroups.com, "traktus5" <kj4321@h...>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Paul. Am studying your article, and will respond. I was
also
> > wondering if there is any more material regarding your 1998 theory
> > (which I read at Tonalsoft.com) that sonance is comprised of the
> > values of prime numbers and (seperately) by the exponents...?
> > thanks, Kelly
>
> This sounds like Monz's theory (which he never got more specific
on),
> not mine. You may be reading Monz's words as mine, and my words as
> his, on the webpage you're looking at. Take a more careful look and
> tell me what you see.